cryptoassets

Subscribe to cryptoassets via RSS
Abstract flowing data ramp.

A recent statutory instrument aims to remove legal uncertainty surrounding crypto staking and ease blockchain operations.

By Stuart Davis, Gabriel Lakeman, and Emma Trankeenan

On 9 January 2025, the UK Government published the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Collective Investment Schemes) (Amendment) Order 2025 (SI 2025/17) (the Staking SI) and the accompanying explanatory memorandum (the Explanatory Memorandum).

The Staking SI together with the Explanatory Memorandum confirm that arrangements where a firm provides services to stake cryptoassets on…

Abstract financial charts with upward arrow on a blue background. 3D Rendering

The FinmadiG introduces material implementation measures for the European Digital Finance Package.

By Axel Schiemann and Lasse Winzer

On 18 December 2024, the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) has passed the Financial Market Digitisation Act (Finanzmarktdigitalisierungsgesetz — FinmadiG). The FinmadiG serves as the German implementation of several European rules, inter alia, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) and Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain cryptoassets (FTR). Under the amendments introduced by…

3D illustration Rendering of binary code wave pattern Abstract background.Futuristic Particles for business,Science and technology background

The guidelines aim to ensure the consistent application of MiCA across the EU, including a standardised classification of cryptoassets.

By Axel Schiemann, Lasse Winzer, Thomas Vogel, Stuart Davis, and Gabriel Lakeman

On 10 December 2024, the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (together, ESAs) have published new joint guidelines on explanations and opinions, and the standardised test for cryptoassets, under Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).

Article 97(1) of MiCA mandated the ESAs to jointly issue guidelines by 30 December 2024 that specify the content and form of the explanation accompanying the cryptoasset white paper referred to in Article 8(4), and the legal opinions on the qualification of ARTs as per Article 17(1), point (b)(ii), and Article 18(2), point (e) of MiCA.

Mica Tracker

Online resource provides overview of delegated acts, technical standards, and guidelines for cryptoasset businesses.

Latham & Watkins has launched the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation Tracker, a new online resource that provides cryptoasset businesses with critical information to help navigate MiCA — a robust and detailed regulatory framework for cryptoassets.

Since MiCA was first published in the EU Official Journal in June 2023, various delegated acts, technical standards, and guidelines have come into force in different stages. By 30 December 2024…

Virtual-Currency-B-Single

Proposed rule would be implemented by statute and would give primacy to parties’ choice of governing law and jurisdiction.

By Stuart Davis, Nell Perks, and Matthew Unsworth

There is at least a tentative consensus in English law that cryptocurrencies and other digital assets are capable of giving rise to property rights.[1] However, there remains considerable uncertainty around which laws should govern proprietary disputes about digital assets and which courts should have jurisdiction over those disputes.

The Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) explained the crux of this problem in their initial report on digital assets in 2018.[2] Traditionally, a question as to rights or entitlement to personal property is governed by the law of the place where the property is situated (lex situs).  But this rule is ill-suited to digital assets which, by their nature, are intangible, digitised, and constituted on a decentralised ledger shared across a network of participants in potentially any number of jurisdictions.

Silver digital crypto-currency coins standing on metal floor

Professional investors will benefit from increased exposure to cryptoassets via traditional financial instruments, though retail investors’ exposure remains limited.

By Stuart Davis, Gabriel Lakeman, and Ivan Pizeta*

In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency, regulatory clarity is essential for both investors and market participants. In March this year, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) made a significant announcement regarding listing cryptoasset-backed Exchange Traded Notes (cETNs) in the UK. This decision marks an important step towards greater regulatory clarity in…

Implementation of Basel Committee cryptoassets standard to provide additional clarity for banks looking to engage in cryptoassets business.

By Simon Hawkins and Adrian Fong

On 7 February 2024, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) released a consultation paper on its proposal for implementing new regulations on the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures (Consultation Paper).

The Consultation Paper comes shortly after the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and the HKMA issued a consultation paper in December 2023 outlining their legislative proposal for a regulatory regime governing stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong (see this Latham blog post). On 20 February 2024, the HKMA also published guidance on digital asset custody services and sale and distribution of tokenised products conducted by banks. Together, these papers offer guidance and greater certainty to banks interested in providing digital asset services (including digital asset issuance, custody, and dealing services).

This blog post summarises the proposed regulations set out in the Consultation Paper as well as next steps for banks, known in Hong Kong as authorised institutions (AI).

feature-7

The requirements in the proposed framework are more extensive in scope and reach than what many virtual asset industry stakeholders anticipated.

By Simon Hawkins and Adrian Fong


On 8 February 2024, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) released a consultation paper on its legislative proposal to introduce a regulatory regime governing over-the-counter (OTC) trading of virtual assets (VA) in Hong Kong (Consultation Paper).

This blog post summarises the proposed regulatory framework set out in the Consultation Paper.

Background

…
Online internet Shopping

The proposal would subject certain large non-bank companies offering wallet and payment services to federal regulatory oversight on par with banks and credit unions.

By Jenny Cieplak, Parag Patel, Barrie VanBrackle, and Deric Behar

On November 7, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed a rule, Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications (the Proposal), to supervise large providers of digital wallets and payment apps. The Proposal aims to ensure that US-based non-bank financial service companies providing digital wallets and payment apps will be subject to the same federal supervisory rules as banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions that the CFPB already supervises.

According to the CFPB, fintech companies and other firms offering novel products and services in the consumer finance space have “blur[ed] the traditional lines of banking and commerce.” The Proposal therefore aims to “enable the CFPB to monitor for new risks to both consumers and the market,” and to “promote fair competition” through consistent enforcement between depository and non-depository institutions.

The new standard aims to improve accounting treatment of certain digital assets under GAAP and may pave the way for increased institutional adoption.

By Jack Barber, Robert J. Malionek, Marlon Q. Paz, Heather Waller, and Deric Behar

On September 6, 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)[1] voted to approve Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets, an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350 (Intangibles—Goodwill and Other), originally proposed in March 2023. The ASU will standardize the treatment of certain digital assets under US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (the Update).

According to FASB, market feedback indicated concern with the current accounting methodology for crypto assets under ASC 350 as indefinite-lived intangible assets (whereby assets must be calculated at a historical cost less impairment, such as for trademarks). The methodology reflects “only the decreases, but not the increases, in the value of crypto assets in the financial statements until they are sold,” and therefore “does not provide investors . . . with decision-useful information . . . that reflects (1) the underlying economics of those assets and (2) an entity’s financial position.”

To address FASB’s concern, the Update now requires an entity to measure crypto assets at fair value[2] each reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income.

The Update also mandates enhanced disclosure requirements concerning an entity’s crypto asset holdings, intended to improve information available to investors.