The FCA is considering whether alternative data could introduce new risks to market integrity.
By Rob Moulton, Fiona Maclean, Stuart Davis, and Charlotte Collins
The FCA’s recently published Insight article explores how alternative data might give rise to market abuse risks. The article reports a significant increase in spending on alternative data in recent years, leading to questions about whether access to such data might provide recipients of the data with an unfair informational advantage over other market participants.
While traditional sources of data, such as a company’s financial statements, may contain inside information and must be treated appropriately before they are made public, the nature of alternative data is less clear-cut. Alternative data does not come from the company itself, and may derive from (or be extrapolated from) a number of sources. Alternative data may allow those with access to know things about a company that others in the market do not know, or that the company itself does not know. This may be the case, even if, as is frequently the case, the pool of structured/unstructured data used by the analytics engine is in the public domain. Evidently, this could provide trading opportunities that put the holder of such information at an advantage, as compared with other market participants.
A key example of where alternative data has raised concerns recently is in relation to so-called “secret polling”. The government has had exchanges with the FCA concerning the potential use of private polling data to obtain a trading advantage in advance of election results. The regulator’s view is that, while the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) might be engaged by such activities, MAR would only apply if the underlying information were to constitute inside information. This is unlikely to be the case, unless the information met the MAR recital 28 test of information “routinely expected by the market” to be published, such as weekly BBC opinion polls. Therefore, MAR does not restrict the sharing of polling information that is not inside information. However, this position clearly raises political questions of fairness, as those able to pay for and access the data may well gain an advantage in the market, and those providing the data may not understand the use to which it will be put.
In what may be the first regulator-approved application of blockchain technology for the settlement of US equities trades, the Division of Trading and Markets of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently 
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has affirmed its commitment to engaging the fast-moving financial technology world by elevating its LabCFTC unit to be an independent operating office within the CFTC, reporting directly to Chairman Heath Tarbert. LabCFTC is the agency’s FinTech hub, led since October 10, 2019, by Chief Innovation Officer and Director Melissa Netram. The announcement about LabCFTC’s new status was made at the agency’s second annual FinTech conference, “Fintech Forward 2019: Exploring the Unwritten Future,” held on October 24, 2019.
In a bid to keep pace with rapid advances in cloud adoption across financial services, regulators have published a raft of new guidance in the past year. Most recently, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority launched guidelines for insurers and reinsurers on outsourcing to cloud providers in July 2019, while the European Banking Authority (EBA) published updated guidance on outsourcing that came into effect on 30 September 2019, covering both cloud and other outsourcings.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body of G-20 central banks and supervisors, continues to scrutinize the use of cloud services by financial services institutions. The FSB previously noted its concerns about the concentration risk of cloud services in the financial markets in a 
In a follow-up to the July 2019 SEC and FINRA 
In an August 22, 2019, letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, in his capacity as chair of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), Congresswoman Katie Porter and Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez urged Secretary Mnuchin to designate the three leading cloud-based storage systems used by major banks — Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud — as systemically important financial market utilities (SIFMUs). This designation would subject such cloud-based storage systems to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). Citing Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act, which was enacted to promote stability in the financial system, the Congresswomen highlighted the dependence on cloud services by banks and financial institutions for their data needs and the subsequent risks such services pose to the safety and stability of the financial system.
On 13 June 2019, the Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority, and the Monetary Authority of Singapore 
Though the majority of the provisions relating to the revised EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) came into force in the UK on 13 January 2018, the regulatory technical standards (RTS) and strong customer authentication measures (SCA) will come into force on 14 September 2019. The FCA has issued a helpful reminder setting out some important deadlines that payment service providers (PSPs) must meet to be compliant.